Decline and Fall (Maybe) Special Edition - January 10, 2011
Print version
Email to a friend
Death Panels, Palin's Targets, and Political Assassination
The attempted assassination of Representative Gabrielle Giffords raises the bar for political lies and hate to a new level. Previously, incendiary political lies stopped just short violent imagery. Sarah Palin's Take Back 20 campaign presented a violent threat in the form of rifle site crosshairs placed over the congressional districts of 20 Democratic supporters of health care reform.
Ironically, Giffords sent Palin a clear message to end the violent allusion in the ads. In this brief video, she warns:
"… we're on Sarah Palin's targeted list but the thing is that the way she's had it depicted has the cross hairs of a gun site over our district. When people do that, they've got to realize that there [are] consequences to that action." Rep. Giffords
The appeal had no effect. It took the events of Saturday, January 8, at a shopping mall in Tucson, Arizona, to finally get Palin to pull down her crosshairs studded map marking 20 Democrats for defeat as punishment for support of health care reform.
Political Assassinations and Assaults
Months before the JFK assassination, right wing zealots in Dallas demonstrated against the dangers posed by the Kennedy administration. The pseudo mug shot (image) accused Kennedy of treason. It appeared on the streets of Dallas, Texas, prior to the assassination. The soon-to-be murdered president was accused of turning the Constitution over to a Communist United Nations; failing to register Communists; invading a "sovereign state" with U.S. troops (e.g., supporting court orders for the racial integration of schools); appointing "Anti-Christians" to government positions; and lying about his "previous marriage and divorce."
The charge of "treason" plus the inflammatory content of the specific lies tarred Kennedy as a criminal and a danger to the country. The net outcome was to dehumanize the president. The mainstream media of the 1960s did not run these inflammatory charges.
The level of personal attacks on President Obama echoes the extreme hatred directed at Kennedy. There are reasons that warrant a vigorous challenge to the current president on issues, tactics, and strategies. When the challenges come in the form of hate filled lies that the president is secretly a Muslim or that he's part of a new world order based on Marxism, the lies have the effect of inflaming the uninformed and bigoted.
In the 1960s, the charges against JFK were published in extremist newsletters and offered at meetings by fringe political groups. Today, the inflammatory charges against President Obama and other Democrats are a part of the mainstream media via Fox Broadcasting and Fox News.
Fox Broadcasting has been the number one or two network over the past few years. The Fox News cable operation, which feeds some local Fox affiliates, is a consistent ratings leader among the cable networks. Lies viewed in print by a few hundred thousand in the 1960s are dwarfed by nonstop lies told on the Fox network to tens of millions every single day.
Fox News hired former Alaska governor Sarah Palin as commentator in January 2010. She made her debut on the O'Reilly show and is a frequent guest of other talking heads on Fox News. While at Fox, Palin began a campaign to get rid of 20 Democrats in the House of Representatives.
Sarah Palin's Targets
From Sara Palin's Take Back 20 web site.Via Townhall.com (Screenshot)
The Palin site is no longer operating.
Sara Palin's web site featured the image above for the Take Back 20 campaign. The crosshairs are those that Rep. Giffords referenced in the video above. USA Today covered the campaign roll-out on September 27, 2010.
"In a website launched on Thursday, the six-month anniversary of the health care law, Palin puts a bull's-eye on 20 House districts under a headline that reads, "We've diagnosed the problem…Help us prescribe the solution."
"Included among Palin's Democratic targets: North Dakota's at-large Rep. Earl Pomeroy, Southeast Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and Virginia Rep. Tom Perriello." USA Today, Sept 24
The link to Palin's Take Back 20 web page is no longer operating.
Palin's active use of violent imagery and violent rhetorical phrases like targeting goes a step further than the defamers of JFK and President Obama. The images of a rifle site crosshairs are paired with the phrase, "We've diagnosed the problem. Help us provide the solution." While defeat in the upcoming elections was the goal, the entire approach to the campaign carried with it a violent double entendre.
Townhall.com, a major right wing web site, ran an article endorsing Palin's campaign. Sarah Palin's "Take Back 20" presented one of Palin's campaign images, a map of the United States (screenshot). The map shows crosshairs, bull's eye images, over each of the 20 congressional districts, targets to be defeated in the 2010 congressional elections. This included Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona.
In the article, commentator Jillian Bandes said that, "Twenty House Dems from districts that McCain carried in 2008 voted for the health care bill, and Sarah Palin has a target on every single one," including Representative Gabrielle Giffords district in Arizona. Bandes continued, "The targets were released on the six-month anniversary of Obamacare." She concluded that, Palin's "site should go a long way towards knocking off the politicians who put their party affiliation ahead of their constituent's demands." (Author's emphasis)
Violent Imagery with Dead Seniors as the Predicate
Unlike the charges against the two presidents, Kennedy and Obama, Palin's core factual claim was accurate. The 20 House Democrats up for election in 2010 had each voted for health care reform. However, the charges that preceeded Palin's Take back 20 campaign were the same type of vile lies presented in the charges against Kennedy and Obama.
The newly formed Tea Party, financed by right wing lobbyists, claimed that the Obama reforms would introduce "death panels." Some reform opponents claimed that these fictitious panels would decide whether seniors would live or die at a certain point in their later years. This was, of course, an absurd lie. Nevertheless, the foundation for irrational hate and fear was established. The composite form of the message was:
The 20 targeted House members voted for a health care bill that created "death panels" to kill seniors simply due to their age. The votes were cast in support of a Muslim president bent on creating a Marxist world government.
Turning Hate into Action
We don't know the story behind accused assassin Jared Lee Loughner. Nor can we assign a certain role for the culture of political hate created over the last few years, including Palin's Take Back 20 campaign. One of those closest to the assassination attempt on Giffords plus the other assaults and murders spoke out clearly. The Sheriff of Pima County, Clarence Dupnik, said:
"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous," Dupnik said. "Unfortunately, Arizona has become sort of the capital. We have become the Mecca for prejudice and bigotry." CNN
Ironically, Gabrielle Giffords made the strongest connection between Palin's violent images and real world consequences when she warned Palin of the consequences of her web site images and rhetoric.
We don't need political assassinations to justify ending the climate of vile lies that has dominated the political landscape over the past two decades. Then again, we didn't need anti-abortion advocates killing doctors to demand that extremists end the charges that doctors performing abortions are "baby killers." We certainly didn't need presidential candidate, Senator John McCain of Arizona, singing "bomb, bomb, bomb Iran" when a calamitous attack on that country was a possibility.
The purveyors of mass delusions tied to violent imagery and hate-filled rhetoric are circling the wagons to defend their inalienable right to lie and inflame those on the edge of reality. Nothing much will change from the top. All the while, critical issues of war and peace and economic survival will remain perpetually on the back burner while the culture of violence erupts repeatedly. This represents an unacceptable and tragic distraction that points to our rapid demise unless leaders listen to the people of this country who, most assuredly, have had enough.
END
You may reproduce this article in part or completely with attribution of authorship and a link to this article.
del.icio.us |
Digg
Interesting comparison with the way media treats the Palin taunts and outright lies (there are no death panels!) as news and the way they refused to give the '60s propaganda against Kennedy any credence.
When major media go to Palin's and Bachmann's Twitter and Facebook feeds for unsavory comments to repeat they legitimize these fringers' uncivil, un-statesmanlike, and too often violent views and suggestions.
If you're fed up, there is something you can do about it. Advertiser boycotts do work. (Beck is no longer on CNN, Dr. Laura has "retired" or is soon "retiring" from her national radio program for her hateful comments.)
Further, corporations that support fringe politicians that stir up hatred can be boycotted and picketed and their role in promoting uncivil behavior deserves wider discussion. Unfortunately, the enablers don't care about the disservice they are doing to the country. The only way to get their attention is to stop being a customer.
Check out Ethical Consumer for info about boycotts. http://www.ethicalconsumer.org/Boycotts.aspx
Somehow, the mental status of the shooter is supposed to absolve all of the hate speech and deliberate lies. Amazing leap of logic. The public knows that presenting inflammatory material to unbalanced people is dangerous.
Kathy, it is time to withhold financial support for those who enable the culture of lies and threats. The current economic conditions make this beneficial in another way.
Now we can sit back and prepare for the attack on anyone who tries to invoke a "culture of responsibility" for deliberate liars. They'll go from Patriot Act supporters to First Amendment experts in no time.
Pleasure to post here!
Post your comment