Home | Health | Consumer genetic tests fall short on claims, accuracy

Consumer genetic tests fall short on claims, accuracy

email Email to a friend
Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Caveat emptor - "Let the Buyer Beware" when buying at-home genetic tests

If you’ve been thinking about laying down money for an at-home genetic test you might want to wait until the testing companies work out the bugs and clean up their advertising.

When the Government Accountability Office (GAO) went undercover and purchased genetic test results from four companies, the results were all over the map. The results were “misleading and of little or no practical use,” says the GOA.

The GAO used fictitious names when it ordered 10 test results from four direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies charging between $299 to $999 per test. One donor that supplied the requested DNA sample to four companies was told he had below-average, average, and above-average risk for prostate cancer and hypertension from the respective companies.

 Another testing company told a donor that she had a decreased risk for developing an irregular heartbeat when, in fact, she’d had a pacemaker implanted over a dozen years ago to treat the condition.

“None of the companies could provide GAO’s fictitious African American and Asian donors with complete test results, but did not explicitly disclose this limitation prior to purchase,” according to the GAO. “Further, follow-up consultations offered by three of the companies failed to provide the expert advice that the companies promised.”

The GAO also noted the widespread use of deceptive marketing by the companies, including claims that someone purchasing the genetic test could use their DNA to create personalized cures. Two of the companies claimed that their supplements, also for sale, could “repair damaged DNA” or cure disease, but genetics experts said there was no scientific basis for the claims.

For the full report: Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Tests: Misleading Test Results Are Further Complicated by Deceptive Marketing and Other Questionable Practices. GAO-10-847T, July 22

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (2 posted):

Tom on 07/30/2010 16:53:34
There are places that have good information about medical articles and I think if you visit my twitter will give you some.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
lipo houston on 08/13/2010 13:04:50
In general, I favor the availability of such evidence, and I think the medical profession and regulators tend to be overly paternalistic when patients seek information.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
total: 2 | displaying: 1 - 2

Post your comment comment

eNews and updates
Sign up to receive breaking news as well as receive other site updates!

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information: verify here .
Blog Communities

Flesh and Stone - Health and Science News - Blogged

Featured in Alltop

Subscribe with Bloglines

Journalist Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory
Add to Technorati Favorites
View Kathlyn Stone's profile on LinkedIn
My Zimbio Top Stories